ptPricingTeardown
All audits

Pricing-page teardowns

Every public audit, sorted newest first. Each report scores 12 dimensions of pricing-page conversion and ranks the top-5 highest-leverage fixes.

32audits
Ccursor.com
Fair
58/100

Clean visual execution and a strong logo bar, but the page defaults to monthly pricing, buries the annual savings signal entirely,…

See full report
Hhubspot.com
Fair
61/100

Feature matrix is exhaustive and tier anchoring is competent, but above-fold clarity is muddled by a promotional banner war, value…

See full report
Pposthog.com
Critical
22/100

PostHog's desktop-OS UI conceit is genuinely clever brand storytelling, but the pricing page screenshot shows only the wallpaper/i…

See full report
Sstripe.com
Strong
71/100

Stripe's pricing page earns its authority through transparency and depth, but the above-fold model clarity and CTA hierarchy are w…

See full report
Llinear.app
Strong
71/100

Clean execution on tier structure, feature matrix, and social proof placement — but above-fold value framing is a category label d…

See full report
Ccursor.com
Fair
54/100

Clean visual execution and a strong logo bar, but the page opens with a bare 'Pricing' headline, defaults to monthly billing, hide…

See full report
Pposthog.com
Weak
28/100

PostHog's pricing page doesn't exist above the fold — the entire 900px viewport is consumed by a desktop OS wallpaper UI with icon…

See full report
Sstripe.com
Fair
62/100

Stripe's transactional pricing model is competently displayed but the page is architected for the already-decided buyer — above-fo…

See full report
Llinear.app
Fair
62/100

Clean execution on feature matrix and annual-default pricing, but the page opens with a bare 'Pricing' H1 and no value prop, the B…

See full report
Ccursor.com
Fair
54/100

Prices and tiers are visible above the fold, which is the floor — but the page defaults to monthly billing, has no recommended tie…

See full report
Hhubspot.com
Fair
62/100

Tier differentiation and feature matrix are thorough, but above-fold is hijacked by a promotional banner, the value prop is catego…

See full report
Pposthog.com
Weak
28/100

PostHog's OS-desktop UI gimmick is memorable brand differentiation everywhere except the pricing page, where it actively destroys…

See full report
Sstripe.com
Fair
62/100

Stripe's pricing page is technically competent but architecturally confused — the above-fold hero adequately surfaces the core rat…

See full report
Llinear.app
Fair
62/100

Clean visual execution and a solid feature matrix, but the page opens with zero value-prop framing, deploys no tier anchoring, and…

See full report
Ttwilio.com
Weak
41/100

The pay-as-you-go model and free start are surfaced above the fold, but the page immediately collapses into a sprawling product ca…

See full report
Ddatadoghq.com
Fair
52/100

Feature matrix and FAQ depth are genuine strengths, but the above-fold experience buries pricing model complexity behind an abstra…

See full report
Aamplitude.com
Fair
58/100

The feature matrix and startup callout section are genuine strengths, but the above-fold communicates product family complexity be…

See full report
Rrender.com
Fair
54/100

The feature matrix and compute pricing sections are genuinely comprehensive, but the above-fold hero leads with a tagline instead…

See full report
Ssentry.io
Fair
58/100

Feature matrix and tier differentiation are genuinely thorough, but the above-fold zone is category-generic, the pricing model (us…

See full report
Mmixpanel.com
Fair
58/100

Tier structure and feature matrix are thorough, but 'Plans that grow with you' wastes the headline slot, pricing model ambiguity a…

See full report
Hhubspot.com
Fair
61/100

Tier differentiation and feature matrix are HubSpot's strengths, but above-fold clarity is undermined by a promotional banner coll…

See full report
Rreplit.com
Fair
58/100

Tier anchoring and annual toggle are executed well, but zero value-prop framing above the fold, no social proof at decision moment…

See full report
Ffigma.com
Fair
58/100

Feature matrix and tier structure are genuinely well-built, but the headline is a meta-instruction rather than a value proposition…

See full report
Ccursor.com
Fair
52/100

Tier cards are clean and logo social proof is elite-tier, but the page opens with a bare 'Pricing' h1, defaults to monthly billing…

See full report
Rresend.com
Fair
58/100

Clean dark-mode aesthetic and a thorough feature matrix work in Resend's favor, but the above-fold section gives visitors zero pri…

See full report
Pposthog.com
Weak
31/100

PostHog's desktop-OS UI conceit is memorable brand work, but the pricing page renders as a macOS desktop with file icons — zero pr…

See full report
Ttailscale.com
Fair
58/100

Solid free tier and feature matrix exist, but the headline 'Plans that work for engineers, IT, security, and home users' leads wit…

See full report
Iintercom.com
Fair
54/100

Dual pricing model (seat + usage) is correctly surfaced, but the hero headline wastes prime real estate on product description ins…

See full report
Vvercel.com
Fair
58/100

Tier names and the feature matrix are competent, but the above-fold value prop is engineer-speak, CTA hierarchy is flat across all…

See full report
Sstripe.com
Fair
54/100

Stripe's transaction-fee transparency is genuinely best-in-class, but the above-fold headline is generic, there is no CTA hierarch…

See full report
Nnotion.com
Fair
61/100

Feature matrix is comprehensive and tier structure is present, but the hero wastes its most valuable real estate on a brand slogan…

See full report
Llinear.app
Fair
58/100

Clean visual execution and a solid feature matrix undercut by a page title that does zero selling, no 'most popular' anchor, three…

See full report